At Spentys, we understand that high-quality scanning is the first and most critical step in creating reliable 3D-printed orthoses. That’s why we’ve conducted a hands-on comparison of several commonly used 3D scanners in the O&P field to help you choose the one that best fits your clinical needs.
This article summarizes our internal evaluation of five different handheld scanners, assessing them based on usability, scan quality, speed, and cost-effectiveness.
Why the Right Scanner Matters
Choosing the right scanner doesn’t just affect your user experience, it directly impacts the accuracy, repeatability, and reliability of the final orthosis. Whether you’re scanning a limb or a mold, you need clean, complete data to generate a precise fit.
That’s why we compared scanners in two key scenarios:
- Scanning the limb directly
- Scanning a plaster cast or mold
Scanner-by-Scanner Insights
Recommendations Based on Your Use Case
|
Use Case |
Recommended Scanner |
|
Scanning directly on the limb (clinic, fast use) |
TrueDepth (iPad/iPhone) or Structure Sensor Pro |
|
Scanning casts or molds (lab or technical users) |
Peel 3.CAD or Einscan H2 |
What Else to Consider
- Lighting: Avoid direct sunlight and ensure even lighting for best results
- White casts: Use high-performance scanners like Peel 3 or Einscan
- Mobile setups: Use iPad-compatible scanners for maximum flexibility
Need Help Choosing?
Reach out to your Spentys representative for tailored advice. We’re happy to walk you through your setup, recommend a scanner, or even offer testing opportunities if you’re unsure.